Dead Heat: Premier League power rankings and season projection, week 34

Shaun Botterill

An updated statistical projection of the remaining Premier League season

This week changed things. For most of the season, it's been expected that the Champions League places would come down to Chelsea, Arsenal, and Tottenham Hotspur. I've been arguing in these pieces that both Liverpool and Everton had non-zero chances to get involved in the race. Arsenal took the needed three points away to mid-table Fulham, while Spurs and Chelsea combined for four points against elite opposition. With the Toffees' loss to Sunderland, following on Liverpool's draw with Reading last week, the door has shut on the fringe contenders. It's a three-team dead heat and no one else in involved.

Projected Table

Club W D L Pts %Title ΔTitle %Top 4 ΔTop 4 %Rel ΔRel
Manchester United 29 4 5 92 100% +.5 100% 0 0% 0
Manchester City 24 9 5 80 0% -1 100% 0 0% 0
Chelsea 21 8 9 70 0% 0 69% -11 0% 0
Tottenham Hotspur 21 8 9 70 0% 0 62% +12 0% 0
Arsenal 20 10 8 70 0% 0 69% +5 0% 0
Everton 16 14 8 63 0% 0 .5% -4.5 0% 0
Liverpool 15 13 10 59 0% 0 0% -.1 0% 0
West Bromwich Albion 14 7 17 50 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
Swansea City 11 13 14 47 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
West Ham United 12 10 16 47 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
Fulham 11 11 16 45 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
Southampton 11 12 15 45 0% 0 0% 0 0% -.1
Norwich City 9 15 14 42 0% 0 0% 0 2% -3
Stoke City 9 14 15 42 0% 0 0% 0 2% -8
Sunderland 10 11 17 42 0% 0 0% 0 2% -10
Newcastle United 11 8 19 42 0% 0 0% 0 3% 0
Aston Villa 9 11 18 39 0% 0 0% 0 33% +7
Wigan Athletic 10 7 21 37 0% 0 0% 0 58% +16
Queens Park Rangers 5 13 21 28 0% 0 0% 0 100% +1
Reading 6 10 22 27 0% 0 0% 0 100% 0

  • There are some rounding issues that make it difficult to display the race for fourth in the table. Chelsea project to 70.4 points, Tottenham to 70.3 and Arsenal to 70.2. The differences in point projection are entirely meaningless. The important thing here is that they're effectively tied. Arsenal project to 20.1 wins, 9.8 draws, and 8.1 losses, which matches their projected points nicely. Tottenham project to 20.8 wins, 8.0 draws and 9.2 losses, so the rounding pushes them to a slightly better record than I really have listed. Chelsea is the most difficult because they project to 20.5 wins, 9.0 draws and 8.5 losses. I've just rounded up the wins and losses, and cut off a draw, even though that is not the mostly likely final record for Chelsea, in order to present the data more smoothly.
  • You can probably also see that Spurs have the smallest chance of making the Champions League, out of the top four contenders, despite the dead heat in points projection. This is all about goal difference. The chance of Spurs missing the Champions League on goal difference is about 8%.
  • How big was Spurs' win at City? If City had maintained their lead—perhaps if they'd extended that lead by converting a chance like Edin Dzeko's first half one-on-one with Hugo Lloris—Spurs would have dropped below a one-in-three chance at making the Champions League.
  • The bottom of the table mimics the top. QPR and Reading are obviously done. While a number of generally bad clubs have not yet guaranteed their own safety, none of them projects to a risk of relegation over three percent. It's a two-team race between Aston Villa and Wigan Athletic, reasonably likely to come down to the final match of the season.
  • Norwich City and Stoke City took necessary wins against relegation fodder QPR and Reading, while Sunderland continued their rather incredible early run under Paolo Di Canio and have nearly escaped from the relegation battle as quickly as they dropped into it.
  • There was one simulation apiece where City missed the top four and where Reading survived. QPR reached safety twice. Southampton were relegated four times in 10,000 simulations. I'm going to go ahead and add Southampton to the "nothing to play for" list.

Nothing to Play For Watch

I added West Ham to the watch last week, and I'll be adding Southampton for next week. Interestingly, while West Ham won solidly home to Wigan, the underlying stats told a quite different story. With two big chances, six shots in the box and eight shots on target, Wigan projected to score about two goals based on their shot and chance production. We probably haven't had enough games to make for a useful sample, and we might not have such a sample even by the end of the season, but so far things are looking to moderately confirm the conventional wisdom. The "nothing to play for" clubs have underperformed attacking expectations and defensive expectations by 5-10% each in the aggregate. The effects of having nothing to play for, if these numbers are correct, are not enough to turn Southampton into Reading, but they might be enough to turn Fulham into Aston Villa.

Power Rankings

Club Team+ Att+ Def- Form+
Manchester City 159 135 56 153
Manchester United 154 144 70 166
Liverpool 139 134 82 151
Tottenham Hotspur 136 132 84 155
Chelsea 132 121 79 133
Arsenal 124 119 86 133
Everton 111 118 103 91
Southampton 97 99 102 114
Swansea City 95 94 104 85
West Bromwich Albion 88 90 105 74
Newcastle United 85 105 126 83
Stoke City 85 69 85 68
West Ham United 85 80 100 75
Fulham 84 90 113 59
Sunderland 78 81 108 92
Wigan Athletic 78 85 116 108
Norwich City 77 77 106 66
Aston Villa 74 82 115 94
Queens Park Rangers 70 78 118 61
Reading 49 69 143 40

  • Liverpool-Chelsea was another classic Liverpool match, creating great chances and finishing off almost none of them, though in this case they just snuck in and stole a draw by the skin of their teeth. (Sorry.) Steven Gerrard and Glen Johnson both chunked one-on-ones with the keeper, and Jonjo Shelvey had an open corner of the goal to hit but sidefooted smoothly into the side netting. They scored twice, but by the numbers it should have been three. It's hard to list those names and not think that the problem with Liverpool is that Luis Suarez is too damn good for his teammates, and he helps create big opportunities that mediocre to bad players like Johnson and Shelvey can't finish.
  • Tottenham's performance against City really impressed the power rankings. Spurs converted their chances at a good rate, but even the two goals projected by the underlying stats would have been twice what an average club would be expected to produce against City. Manchester City have been brilliant defensively all year, and the 15 minute stretch where Tottenham's 4-3-3 tore them apart may have been the best that anyone has played against City in the league this whole season. Spurs leapfrogged Chelsea in the yearlong power rankings and both Liverpool and City in the form rankings based on this performance.
  • Norwich, who have been predictable and toothless in the final third for months, managed 14 shots in the box and eight on target against Reading. Reading are terrible.
Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Cartilage Free Captain

You must be a member of Cartilage Free Captain to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Cartilage Free Captain. You should read them.

Join Cartilage Free Captain

You must be a member of Cartilage Free Captain to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Cartilage Free Captain. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.